Today's Weather

24 °C | A few clouds

On Screen

The Dark Knight

  • Favorite
  • Recommend: 8   Recommend

BY Jason Anderson   July 16, 2008 14:07

Editorial Rating:
Starring Christian Bale, Heath Ledger. Written by Jonathan and Christopher Nolan. Directed by Christopher Nolan. (14A) 152 min. Opens July 18.

An impeccably crafted but inevitably problematic rumination on corruption, chaos and the choices faced by “decent men in an indecent time,” The Dark Knight has ambitions far beyond those of the average comic-book franchise flick. Indeed, director Christopher Nolan heaps gravitas onto Bob Kane and Bill Finger’s creation like so much sauerkraut on a hotdog.
The Batman saga has always encouraged much in the way of Nietzschean chin-scratching and Manichean hand-wringing. With 2005’s Batman Begins, Nolan re-energized the cycle by simultaneously reintroducing its philosophical underpinnings and roughening up the action. Here, he doesn’t achieve the same balance of brain and brawn even if certain images — like the bravura shot of Heath Ledger’s Joker in a nurse’s outfit blithely strolling away from a hospital that he’s in the midst of blowing up — are instantly iconic.

Sounding more like a New Jersey bookie than Jack Nicholson’s hammy slice of villainy, the late Ledger’s defiantly un-flamboyant version of Batman’s least favourite funnyman proves to be The Dark Knight’s sparkplug. Whenever the movie strays too far from his radius, matters bog down, such that the 152-minute running time can seem both protracted and oddly abbreviated. Likewise, the IMAX-enhanced action sequences are tersely paced, impressively scaled yet largely devoid of novelty.

And though Nolan’s almost palpably eager for The Dark Knight to be read as a political allegory, its questions about the value of laws in a lawless world has been more clearly articulated in predecessors ranging from The Ox-Bow Incident to Dirty Harry. Nevertheless, that such an angry, cynical and combative work could ever qualify as mass entertainment testifies to the indecency of our times. 

Email us at: LETTERS@EYEWEEKLY.COM or send your questions to EYEWEEKLY.COM
625 Church St, 6th Floor, Toronto M4Y 2G1

User Comments



Be the first to comment
imi Aug 13, 2008 1:42P
nice film? only the sound kept me up
JakeTheFatMan Jul 21, 2008 5:28P
It would have been nice if you expressed your opinion of the movie as such. Though the internet does only take notice of extremes, dealing in absolutes (“…great film. PERIOD.”). I just think an opinion or an idea should sit on its own regardless of motivations behind them, and isn’t any less valid because of them. Whether the movie was successful in its themes seems too subjective to argue. I think the movie’s bleakness being testament to our indecent times says more about the reviewer’s view of the masses. I know I watch a Batman film to see the forces of good triumph over evil. The Dark Knight does a wonderful job of complicating and blurring that line. And I do think the movie was brilliant. Though, I still think your behaviour was very reminiscent of the internet stereotype you see in countless message boards.
sillygeese Jul 21, 2008 1:08P
(part 2 of message below)...... of such things - especially those who you’ve never gotten to know personally. And lastly - you make a valid point that I did not go after any of Anderson’s arguments. I think the one that pushed me over the edge was “the indecency of our times” part. NOW I understand why Tolkien had issues with allegory! Even if Nolan wants us to come away with this theme, I don’t think that the film’s excellence is contingent upon that fact. If anything, Anderson places too much emphasis on it.
sillygeese Jul 21, 2008 1:06P
Dear JakeTheFatMan,
Firstly, I admit that I wrote those comments in the heat of the moment (and after a significant amount of wine). There is nothing wrong with being a film student (in fact, a good friend of mine is currently studying at NYU). I just get the sense that Anderson is picking at invisible scabs, so to speak. As a student of philosophy, I suppose that I’m overly sensitive to discourse for the sake of discourse. Secondly - since the matter of gender seems to be part of your response, you should know that I'm in fact a 33 year-old female. And not a stereotypically “nerdy” one at that. (Fanboys, calm down, I’m on your side, LOL!) The truth is that I haven’t seen most superhero/comic-based films. I just found that The Dark Knight was truly exceptional in every way. (I feel the need to climb the roof of my house and scream Heath Ledger at the top of my lungs….oh wait, I am a nerd.) Thirdly – It’s good that you don’t use film as a means of asserting individuality. But you shouldn’t presume that others are guilty
JakeTheFatMan Jul 21, 2008 11:16A
@sillygeese In the words of Homer Simpson: nneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd I'd take a stab that "NOW" and "Star" snuggly fit your biased fanboyish views of the movie. I do not need to use this movie as a means of social identity. Go off and vote on IMDB. Neither of you have argued any of the points that were made. And I guess, with my jaded view of the world, I find the movie's themes embedded in this mass entertainment, refreshing.
Page 1 of 2 < >
Film Finder
|
GO

Related Stories

Death Race
This loose remake of 1975 cult classic Death Race 2000 has a fatal flaw: thanks to its 18A rating, the only people who’d enjoy the videogame gore — preteen and teen boys — won’t be able to see it without mom or dad holding their hand.

The House Bunny
The sorority in The House Bunny bears the initials ZAZ, after the trio (David Zucker, Jim Abrahams, and Jerry Zucker) that produced Airplane! and The Naked Gun. This is probably the subtlest joke in a broad high concept comedy written – or more precisely r

The Longshots
Tattoo sleeves, a potty mouth and marketing savvy brought Limp Bizkit frontman Fred Durst to brief fame but directing family flicks seems to be his hope to sustain a career.

MORE INSIDE




Copyright 1991 - 2007 EYE WEEKLY Newspapers Limited. All Rights Reserved. Distribution transmission,
Republication of any materials is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of EYE WEEKLY.
EYE WEEKLY is a division of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
Register User